A tragic train derailment in the Mexican state of Oaxaca has resulted in the deaths of at least 13 people, an incident likely to revive censure from critics regarding the speed and execution of the country's major government projects.
The accident took place on the Interoceanic Train, a route built to link the Atlantic and Pacific across the slenderest section of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. This project was intended to establish an competing rail corridor to the Panama Canal, with the goal of spurring regional growth in the area.
“We shall meticulously determine the reasons behind this incident,” stated the head of state.
The official reported that, of the some 250 people on board, another 98 were injured, with five of those in grave condition. The official stated plans to travel to Oaxaca to meet those involved.
Major Initiative of Former Government
The Interoceanic Train was a signature public works project of the immediate past president, whose presidency concluded the previous year. This project was a hallmark of his leadership's strategic agenda for the southeastern region.
Another multi-billion dollar railway undertaking from that period, a tourist and cargo loop around the Yucatán Peninsula, was also central to the comprehensive effort to stimulate the economic fortunes of a relatively less developed part of the country.
Construction Oversight and Safety Concerns
The development of both railway systems was managed by the armed forces, marking a dramatic increase of its role in national projects. They were built at an fast-tracked pace, beating predictions to be at least partly inaugurated before the end of that government.
However, this rushed timetable had concurrently fueled persistent concerns over safety standards.
- Sunday's accident was the third event on the Interoceanic Train within the past twelve months.
- This encompasses an prior collision this month when a train hit a truck at a level crossing.
- The other major rail project has also had a couple of non-deadly derailments.
Calls for Audit and Pause
In the aftermath of the catastrophe, the chief of a key rival party called for an prompt pause in the development and management of all similar projects.
This halt was proposed while awaiting a comprehensive safety audit. The party declared that the tragedy "requires prompt explanations."
In reply, the national leader insisted that the train had been operating in total compliance with all safety requirements. Promises were given that the government would remain "responsible" in both the development and operation of these vital projects.
